|
Published in The NY Post 09/16/2004
BY NICOLE GELINAS E-mail:
nicolegeli@hotmail.com
AFTER 9/11, the United States invaded two states: Afghanistan
and Iraq. Cantor Fitzgerald the World Trade Center financial
firm that bore a full 22 percent of 9/11's deaths enjoys no
such sovereign powers. So Cantor has spent three years preparing
its own bloodless counterstrike.
Cantor wants to cut cleanly through the cocoon that, the firm
alleges, protected and promoted the slaughterers of its WTC
employees: The insular world of Saudi Arabian finance.
"The attacks of September 11, 2001, . . . could not have been
accomplished without the knowing and intentional financial
support lent to al Qaeda . . . by a global network of banks,
institutions, charities, relief organizations, businesses,
individual financiers, foreign governments and foreign
government officials," Cantor Fitzgerald argues in a civil suit
filed in Manhattan federal court two weeks ago. (The Port
Authority, the WTC's owner, has since joined in as
co-plaintiff.)
It takes global finance to fight global finance. So Cantor has
assembled an A-list team of the East Coast's best corporate
lawyers to trace the 9/11 money network back to what the firm
alleges was its Saudi nexus.
Cantor has hired law firm Dickstein Shapiro to make its case
and the legal minds there aren't personal-injury sharks who file
frivolous suits against deep-pocketed defendants. Dickstein's
anti-trust and business-litigation lawyers are just as skilled
at defending alleged financial and corporate conspirators as
they are at prosecuting them.
They know the secrets of global finance and they play to win.
Let other 9/11 victims and survivors sue to determine the facts
that led up to 9/11. Cantor is certain it already knows what
happened on 9/11 and who paid for the attack. It wants $7
billion cash money for its lost property and profits, plus
punitive damages not an empty moral victory over amoral
terrorists.
Cantor is, of course, suing al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. The
firm's 60-page complaint strips the Muslim veil from al Qaeda,
exposing it for what it is a "highly organized" racketeering
network headed by global criminal masterminds who toil in
service of a clear, common goal. In al Qaeda's own words: "To
kill the Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever
they find it."
More important: Cantor is suing Saudi Arabia itself along with
dozens of prominent Saudi charities, banks and bankers. The
complaint is thus a concise tutorial on Saudi finance.
Prior to 9/11, al Qaeda needed $50 million a year to plan and
execute terrorist activities. But the 9/11 Commission has noted
that bin Laden likely did not endow al Qaeda from a massive
personal fortune. Instead, Cantor alleges, al Qaeda relied on a
central tenet of Islamic law to underwrite its activities: Zakat.
Cantor's brief explains the principle of compulsory Zakat, or
charitable "almsgiving," through which Muslims aid the poor and
dispossessed. In Saudi Arabia, Zakat payments by individuals and
corporations are collected and distributed by the government.
Cantor alleges that the Saudi monarchy, via three powerful Saudi
princes Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs head Prince
Sultan, Interior Minister Prince Naif and High Commissioner for
Relief Prince Salman transferred Zakat funds to
state-sanctioned terrorist sponsors like the
Islamic
International Relief Organization (founded by bin Laden's
brother-in-law), the Muslim World League and the Mercy
International Relief Agency.
The three princes engaged in a pattern of racketeering that
resulted in "an uninterrupted flow of financial and material
support" to al Qaeda, the suit alleges - enabling al Qaeda to
"plan, orchestrate and carry out the Sept. 11 attacks."This
even after then-President Bill Clinton and European diplomats
had repeatedly warned the Saudi government throughout the 1990s
that Saudi charities were funding terrorist activities across
the globe.
But the Cantor suit goes much further: It slices at the core of
Saudi finance, targeting Saudi Arabia's central bank and the
kingdom's commercial and investment banks and bankers.
The suit alleges that Central Bank SAMA and the biggest Saudi
banks like National Commercial Bank (NCB) and al-Baraka
Bancorp aided al Qaeda. "The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia oversaw
the operations of the Saudi-based banking and financial
defendants . . . with the full knowledge and awareness that they
were providing ongoing financial and material support to al-Qaeda,"
Cantor alleges.
Specifically: The suit alleges that NCB supported al Qaeda and
Cantor has submitted congressional testimony by a former CIA
operative that there is "little doubt that a financial conduit
to bin Laden was handled through the National Commercial Bank."
The suit further alleges that Khalid bin Mahfouz, a former NCB
president, was an al Qaeda "Golden Chain" donor who funnelled up
to $100 million to al Qaeda accounts in the 1990s. While Mahfouz
was bank president in 1998, for example, the US government
complained to Saudi Arabia that the bank was funding terrorist
activities in Afghanistan and Chechnya.
The suit also alleges that the founder of the Jeddah-based
Dallah al-Baraka financial conglomerate, Saleh Abdullah Kamel,
was another Golden Chain donor.
The suit alleges further that the founder of a third
"legitimate" Mideast financial network, al-Barakaat Exchange's
Shaykh Ahmed Nur Jimale, had close ties with bin Laden and
that al Qaeda funnelled up to $20 million a year through that
bank.
If Cantor gets its jury trial in Manhattan, it will be
interesting to see if those who run Saudi Arabia's leading banks
will come and defend themselves, and the actions of their
current and former employees or if they will forfeit the suit.
Iraq's Saddam was content to live under permanent U.N. sanctions
but Saudi financiers want to live half in our world and half
in their own. An Al-Baraka subsidiary controls a bank in
Chicago, for example. Would the banks fight Cantor to preserve
their assets and contacts here or will they recede further
into the Arabian world?
Another point: Cantor's suit targets Saudis but the outcome
will have implications for banks worldwide.
The suit is an attempt to exact civil penalties for alleged
violations of pre-9/11 U.S. laws.
Cantor alleges, in part, that the defendants aided a violation
of the Anti-Terrorism Act on US soil: 9/11. But since 9/11,
Congress has passed the Patriot Act which mandates that
American banks follow strict new safeguards to prevent money
laundering and terrorist financing.
Those banks and international banks who do business here
would view a Cantor victory as a warning that they, too, could
be held liable for future terrorist acts if they engage in
nefarious, or even simply negligent, banking practices.
Dear Ms. Nicole Gelinas:
I appreciate the article you wrote today regarding 9/11. Its
nothing but the truth, this story should get full coverage. I
would like your permission to place your article on my
web-sites tribute page
www.broadchannel1.com/tribute.htm along with my other site
www.AmericanLegionPost1404.com.
Ive lost friends on 9/11and would like to use your point of
view regarding why we are at war.
No content or editing will be done on my part and Ill link the
article to were ever you request.
Sincerely,
Robert OHare
This is some resources I found on the web
Today, more than 250 Islamic banks are operating from China to
USA, managing funds to the tune of 200 billion USD. Western
banks, through their Islamic Units in U.K, Germany, Switzerland,
Luxembourg, etc. also practice Islamic banking.
Besides, Islamic funds have found a flourishing market in USA
and Europe
These are
Banks in the USA alone...... Scary to me......
Abrar Investments, Inc., Stamford CT
Al-Baraka Bancorp Inc. Chicago
Al-Madina Realty, Inc., Englewood NJ
Al-Manzil Islamic Financial Services
Amana Mutual Funds Trust, State St.
Bellingham WA
Ameen Housing Co-operative, San Francisco
American Finance House
Bank Sepah, Iran
BMI Finance & Investment Group, New Jersey
Dow Jones Islamic Index Fund of the Allied
Asset Advisors Funds
Failaka Investments, Inc., Chicago IL
Fuloos Incorporated, Toledo OH
Hudson Investors Fund, Inc., Clifton NJ
MSI Finance Corporation, Inc., Houston TX
Samad Group, Inc., Dayton OH
Shared Equities Homes, Indianapolis IN
HSBC, USA
MEF Money, USA
Islamic Credit Union of Minnesota, (ICUM)
United Mortgage
This should be researched more...................... Also must
reads:
1998 East African
Bombing
Muslim Male Extremists |